Unlike that processor, M1 has 8 cores, and they are asymmetric: It is far more powerful than the entry-level dual core processor in the 2015 MacBook. 4 cores are High Performance (Firestorm) cores: They run as fast as possible, while being decently energy efficient. They are used to boot macOS and run intensive user applications. Display with at least 1280 x 1024 pixel resolution and 24-bit color. Graphics card with at least 512 MB of video memory and driver support for OpenGL 2.0 (minimum requirement).M1 easily destroys the Intel processors found in the high-tier 13-inch MacBook Pros. If they need the extra Thunderbolt ports, that's understandable, but consider waiting a few months. Rumours are speculating that Apple could release a high-tier MacBook Pro with an even more powerful Apple silicon chip. As of Update 1, AmigaOS 4.1 FE can use Zorro III RAM as main memory (not just for swap purposes, as was the case for previous versions of AmigaOS 4).I'm asking this question here because I have a wonderful, very dear and amazing friend who simply does not believe me that 8GB RAM will be enough memory for their needs and was actually also considering paying more for a MacBook Pro than the Air because at $1000, this Mac must be too slow for everything that they need to do.The Mac my friend gets will be an essential part their life: they go to college full-time and also work as an instructor online, so they need to record Zoom presentations, then use teaching software that requires Intel i5 processing speed or better to do various tasks like securely upload course recordings and download course materials.Their current Mac, an early 2015 MacBook 1.1GHz Dual-Core M, also with 8GB RAM and 250GB SSD, has slowed down over time, so they're afraid that an entry-level MacBook Air M1 won't suit their needs because it will too slow, get too hot and suffer from low-battery life like their current Mac basically, it won't be able to handle all of their day-to-day tasks without more RAM memory.I've told my friend that with an external drive for their excess media plus iCloud, the entry-level MacBook Air has all the speed they need for work, play and school, including importing iPhone pictures, playing music and the SIMS 4 (with Expansion Packs), watching YouTube and Vimeo and finally using Apple programs like iChat, Safari, Mail, Pages, etc.I don't even see the RAM cache being an issue since nothing will be very memory intensive, so why pay Apple $200 extra for another 8GB of RAM? Then again, I may be way off here since I don't own one (yet).Am I being a little too minimalist, or worse, too frugal? I don't know for sure, so that's why I'm asking.While the current version of macOS runs fine with 8 GB of RAM (not including swap usage), it's a good idea to future-proof a new Mac at the time of purchase.
At present, the performance on a high end Wintel would be comparable to a 60 MHz 601 (or a PowerMac 6100) - according to the to the PearPC website. Either way, PearPC isn't going to entice people to use AmigaOS or MorphOS on a Wintel box. Well, I was under the impression that AmigaOS needed some sort of activation key which was stored in the AmigaOne ROM. They are used to run macOS and light-weight tasks.Regarding the MacBook Pro, since the Air and Pro use the exact same chip, the only real advantages the Pro has over the Air is a Touch Bar, a bigger battery, and a fan. Would something like PearPC or MOL change this. You also have a vendor who was good enough, or desparate enough, to license their ROMs and OSes for use in emulation. It is also unlike slightly more obsolete platforms where piracy is the norm. This is unlike other platforms which are comparably obsolete where people say piracy is bad, wink, wink. Would I be willing to dump serious money into an alternative? I already do (I already run Apple hardware). They are slow and bloated, which doesn't fit my philosophy. My reasoning is simple: the people who are genuinely interested in using these operating systems are probably willing to pay the price for the hardware, and there are margins to be made off of hardware.Would you loose potential, genuinely interested users? Sure you would! I'll use myself as an example: I'm tired of the status quo in operating systems. On the other hand, if it was a $200 OS I would be much more likely to buy it sight unseen. If I don't like the OS, I would loose a considerable amount of money. It looks like an AmigaOne G4 would cost over $1000 Canadian. ![]() Now if I could give the OS a "test run" even if it is slow. That is why I don't have an A1. I can't just toss that type of money around. ![]() Then decide if I want to buy the hardware. Like I said it would be a lot eaiser to buy just the OS and give it a trial, even if the emulation was slow. It doesn't have to be a real "Bad" thing for Amiga. If for no other reason than to say that it can be done. It's only a matter of time before someone cracks it, whether the intentions be "good" (OS4/MOS on Peg/A1) or malicious (d00d! l33t h4x0r g33k5).From what I understand, OS4 won't be available in a standalone package (Cyberstorm and Blizzard PPC versions excepted), only through the purchase of an AmigaOne. Who would wan't to buy an G3 Amiga for alomst as much money then it would cost them to get an Apple? Who are they kidding?The dongle code present in the AmigaOne isn't infallible (nothing is). I understand that PPC has many, many advantages but it is also very, very expensive. Over $700 for a motherbord running a G3, no memory, no graphics, no sound, no case, no powersupply. I have heard that the price will never come down and might even go up. As it is I don't think I will ever get an other Amiga. A few people have heard about Apple and Linux, but they don't know what they are or how to obtain them. There will be no recovery because very few people know that alternatives to those Intel driven beige boxes exist. We're really in for it then.I'd prefer it if work on getting MOS/OS4 booting under emulation was halted until the market "recovers," but if KMOS/Hyperion/Genesi were to work with the developers of this emulator to create a low-price MOS/OS4 "demo" for x86 machines, that would be kinda cool.The Amiga market is too small to be taking chances with.Matt: I'm sorry to be blunt about this, but the Amiga is not going to recover. Therefore, this emulator could eventually become a hardware replacement solution in software. (Are there others which I should be aware of?)Of course that doesn't mean that the Amiga is dead. Very few people know about the AmigaOS alikes, like AROS or MorphOS. Very few people know that there is an update OS on the other side of the event horizion. It also means that piracy is very unlikey. It would mean one less revenue source. That bit about paying enough for it is why I think selling the OS separate of the hardware is suicidal. The fact that Linux now has major computer shows aimed at business computing, and that companies such as IBM, Novell, Red Hat, HP and Sun (amongst others) are all developing for the platform suggests otherwise. Their recent advertising campaign against Linux is proof of the pudding that they are still fighting the battle. The only way that is going to change is when a new technology replaces the PC.I don't think "the OS wars ended a long time ago", in my opinion they are still going on.Microsoft are definitely in the best position with their OS running on over 90% of PC's around the world, but they haven't won by a long shot. No one is going to recover because there is too much money invested in Microsoft software (and Intel hardware). Microsoft won, and everyone else lost. Get More Ram Than 512 On Pearpc For Osx Operating Upgrade And SecurityCompanies always want to cut costs and with upgrade and security patches costing business's money it's no wonder they're looking into alternatives.The point I'm trying to make is that it's not all over. It's not the be-all and end-all solution to OS dominance as you suggest. I'm sure there are many more examples of the switch from Windows.The fact that too much money is invested into Microsoft's OS and software *is* proving to be a problem. China is also looking for alternative OS's to run on their PC's as their economy grows. Visual studio mac android emulatorThat said, I am a bit of a pessimist as far as the future of the industry is concerned. I even refuse to use their products at home, where I make the decisions, and try to avoid it outside of the home, where the decisions of others are thrust upon me. I mean look where Linux is today.Please don't construe my words as support for Microsoft. The basic problem is recovering your data once it has been locked up by a particular vendor. They will probably have much success. :-DAs for the impending threat of Linux, Microsoft is doing their best to head it off. Fortunately, there are a few other islands out there to chat with. Ignoring Windows, of course. But survival is different from capturing a healthy chunk of the market.But the question we should be asking ourselves is will the Amiga, or an Amiga clone survive? Unix systems are nice, but I'm rather distressed that the only major surviving operating systems are based on some version of Unix. That is the heritage of Unix, which has survived and evolved for some 35 years now. Seeming as the system is out there with the source code, it will continue to adapt to new technologies for decades to come. None of this means that Linux can be destroyed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorStephanie ArchivesCategories |